An elearning cautionary tale I: What went wrong with the online training scheme
As promised, this post offers my perspective on what went wrong with the training scheme scenario I described a couple of weeks ago: (Original post: An elearning cautionary tale I: Our online training scheme).
What went wrong
Fundamentals
The problems started immediately with the MD’s own attitude. On one hand, it’s great that he takes a real interest in the CPD that goes on in his organisation and wants to bring it up to date, but his lack of knowledge about elearning and tendency to be waylaid by shiny toys are obstructive. In addition, both the HR Manager and (especially) Head of Staff Development are themselves in need of CPD about organisational elearning. Better backgrounds and knowledge would have stopped this situation from happening in the first place. If the MD had asked his HR people to upskill themselves instead of pushing software at them, the foundation could have been put in place to allow updated learning to be implemented properly.
If they felt things needed to change quickly, this would have been the time to bring in an eLearning Specialist or Consultant to provide some immediate support with the whole process of updating their training.
eLearning is not IT
Another fundamental and extremely common error was going to the IT Manager for an opinion about elearning. Some orgs even go so far astray as to class elearning as an IT project, giving more emphasis to the “e” than to the “learning”. From his answers, it’s clear to see that the IT Manager (rightly) concentrates on his area of expertise — the technical aspects of the software and its ability to integrate with the org’s own systems and network. This is important, but it tells nothing about how effective the software will be to deliver the particular training envisioned.
eLearning is not IT, in the same way that dentistry is not drilling equipment and cooking is not pots and pans. These are all tools used for a more varied discipline or activity. IT is a complex and technical subject that infiltrates just about every part of our lives; “elearning” merely calls attention to that fact in relation to traditional ways of learning.
Reactions
These fundamental errors and warning signs put in motion a whole chain of reactions that developed as a somewhat panicky response to the MD’s original whim. The organisation does not seem to have a culture in place allowing managers to disagree with the MD, or else the Head of Staff Development may have been able to talk about the virtues and benefits of their current practice. I’m a firm believer in the “horses for courses” tenet, which advocates finding the best solution for a problem — don’t change just for change’s sake. There was clearly no driving need to force a change, and experiments with using elearning could have developed with deliberation and small-scale piloting.
Lack of skill
The project staff knew they didn’t have the expertise to use the software to full advantage in terms of both creative multimedia skills and dynamic instructional design, and thus could only produce boring text-heavy tutorials. Where affordable, external contractors with a track record of producing vibrant elearning may have led to the best results, and/or intensive CPD for the project staff, which has the added benefit of giving them valuable skills.
Chaotic rollout
With any major change to working practice, especially anything viewed as mandatory, more consideration needs to be taken for preparing the staff and then for the actual rollout. Instrumental to this is training, even if the software seems “intuitive”. HR should have thought ahead of time about issues of access for travelling or remote staff, and this is where IT should have been consulted to make sure everyone could get onto the system one way or another. Finally, anyone else required to complete the training who is not set up with computing (e.g., cleaners) should have an alternative version to make sure they’re included.
The knee-jerk draconian reaction to employee disatisfaction simply made matters worse, and a betting man would have put money on someone finding a way to circumvent the system.
What started as a simple attempt to bring in some new training ideas turned into a major war between management and staff.
Solutions
Ideally, an eLearning Specialist would have been called in at the first glimmer of an idea to avoid problems from happening, or at least somewhere earlier in the process to do damage limitation. Even at this late stage, he or she can help with finding ways to get back on track.
The first thing to do is to make sure everyone is able (one way or another) to complete the first of the tutorials which have already gone out and been mandated. Be gentle and don’t worry about a few cheats. Let this episode fade from memory. Run a traditional workshop with an especially good lunch, end the day a bit early and let people go home, creating goodwill. Use your best HR techniques to restore a good relationship with the staff. Stop production on the further tutorials and call in the eLearning Specialist, who will help you decide how to rethink the use of elearning in a more organic and successful way. If you’ve already bought software, he or she can make sure you find ways to use it well. If you haven’t he or she will have an opportunity to present a range of options that might suit your needs better.
Did you see other issues or solutions?
![]()






