Social Media Revolution
Can businesses afford to ignore social media?
Credit: Socialnomics
Credit: Socialnomics

This is the fifth and last in a series of posts aimed at organisations and educational institutions who wish to overhaul existing learning programmes. I bring together keypoints from the earlier posts along with new ones.
Before rushing ahead to ‘blend’ a programme or implement any major changes, it is important to start with first principles:
Distance learning particularly suffers from the danger of isolation and tedium, which can be alleviated with structured online group learning.
Possibilities include:
Often, the first thought a team has when considering an online presence for a programme is to turn all printed materials into PDF files or static web pages. This has the benefit of increasing access to those who do not already have print copies but it has the drawback of extending online time and shifting the burden of printing to the learner without offering a real change in the programme and possibilities for learning.
There are more effective ways that programmes can be blended to include online elements, including:
Quality tutor contact and involvement can help to stimulate and encourage learners to remain on a programme. However this can be a fraught issue when expectations change abruptly, particularly when there is little or no remuneration for the work. The key here is quality of contact, rather than simply quantity, but quality does require commitment and time. The online environment provides an opportunity for tutors to speak one-to-many, which could conceivably reduce the time commitments that individual emails or phone calls might require.
Some of the ways tutors could participate online effectively:
Learners can create the same kinds of support networks for each other that should exist with programme staff. By creating a space ready for learners to create this network, some of the pressure can be taken off staff. However, just stating that learners can do this and leaving them to their own devices will not work. Telephone and email are not the right methods for many-to-many communication, and face-to-face is clearly out of the question in a distance learning programme unless a couple of learners just happen to live in close proximity. One online network is ideal for this.
Suggestions to help build successful online learner networks:
Formative assessment in distance learning study is a key way to ensure that learners stay on track with the programme and get regular progress checks, tutor contact and general feedback. This constitutes a level of support that can help reduce dropout rates.
Ways to add/improve formative assessment:
Keep with other available tools on the internet that freely enable collaboration, sharing of information and use of latest technologies. Develop the habit of thinking about the programme when you discover new tools and considering whether they might be useful to certain aspects. Make sure the programme has room to grow with new discoveries.
Some of the popular online spaces and tools currently being used in education include:
In addition, a shift in emphasis away from independence and towards collaboration paves the way for the development of communities of practice — spaces to share good professional practice, ideas, resources and support. These are easily created and sustained through online environments, and they can provide informal continuing professional development for those who have successfully completed the programmes.



These are my key recommendations. Please add your own suggestions for updating learning programmes.
Posts in this series:
1. Updating Learning Programmes I: 10 First Principles
2. Updating Learning Programmes II: Assumptions that form obstacles (DL in HE)
3. Updating Learning Programmes III: Assessment
4. Updating Learning Programmes IV: Active online participation
5. Updating Learning Programmes V: 7 Recommendations
This is the fourth in a series of posts aimed at organisations and educational institutions who wish to overhaul existing learning programmes.
The early work of Etienne Wenger, Gilly Salmon and Nancy White* brought to the attention of educators interested in making use of online and remote technologies the benefits of online discussion and the formation of communities to promote learning. There are a number of ways to engage learners and encourage active participation in an online space. These may include:
One of the strongest areas for engagement, but one that is often overlooked by course designers, is a space that allows learners to offer mutual support and build solidarity in order to increase motivation and reduce feelings of isolation and attrition. This is not the same thing as “cafes” or ice-breaker areas, which are usually unstructured and unmoderated chaotic spaces that often go off-topic. This is a place for learners to feel safe letting their hair down, asking for emotional help and admitting to anxieties.
A good way to approach this is to:
Make sure there’s a place for learners to ask questions and get help and feedback from course tutors and administrators. This should be distinct from the peer support area, which is not monitored by authorities, by focusing more on factual and procedural issues. The key here is to make sure this area is monitored daily and questions are answered promptly. This is a good place to build a FAQ in order to avoid answering the same common questions over and over, but you do need to be patient with repetition.
The online space needs to allow participation at any time and on any reasonably late-model computer with an internet connection. As the internet gets more and more ubiquitous, most courses in the west can make this a requirement for participation, but be aware of what access issues learner may have, including geographical limitation and disabilities, before setting requirements.
Blended learning is often challenged by being primarily (and historically) a traditional face-to-face course that has online activities added to it as a poor relation. To make the most of the online aspect of a blended learning course, the whole course needs to be overhauled and rebuilt according to which kind of activities are most appropriate for particular learning goals (please see the first post in this series: 10 First Principles). The online aspect needs to be as embedded in the course design as the original face-to-face, and the two can be linked through multi-faceted (problem-based) projects, lead-in and follow-up discussions, etc.
Last but not least, a great benefit to online interaction is that it not only provides a place to build and share knowledge, but also to record it as a resource, evidence and posterity. Learners receive validation by peers, and the chance for participants to bring in their own experience and share good practice from work-based learning can continually develop and challenge ideas. This provides opportunities to expand on course content, and the improving knowledge and deepening understanding turned into a shared resource and reference/knowledge bank. Developing a record of dialogue over time, discussions can be archived and the process of discussion available for future reference.
* Etienne Wenger, Social Learning theory and Communities of Practice: http://www.ewenger.com; Gilly Salmon, E-Moderation: http://www.atimod.com; Nancy White (Full Circle), Facilitation and Community-building: http://www.fullcirc.com/



This is just a selection of things to think about. Please add your own suggestions for improving active online participation.
Posts in this series:
1. Updating Learning Programmes I: 10 First Principles
2. Updating Learning Programmes II: Assumptions that form obstacles (DL in HE)
3. Updating Learning Programmes III: Assessment
4. Updating Learning Programmes IV: Active online participation
5. Updating Learning Programmes V: 7 Recommendations